Stay up to date with California labor law requirements and legislative changes in Gallagher Krich’s 2026 compliance guide.
California isn’t like other U.S. states when it comes to employment law. The state legislature doesn’t just set a floor: it raises it regularly, backed by enforcement mechanisms that have no federal equivalent. The Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) alone has generated tens of thousands of notices to California employers over the past several years, and wage-and-hour class actions remain among the most active areas of business litigation in the state.
The good news is that most compliance failures are preventable. The bad news is that they require ongoing attention — thresholds shift annually, sector-specific rules layer on top of statewide ones, and what was compliant payroll practice in 2024 may not be in 2026.
Here’s a breakdown of the foundational labor law requirements currently governing California workplaces to help keep you updated, with current 2026 figures and recent legislative changes.
1. Statewide Minimum Wage
Effective January 1, 2026, California’s statewide minimum wage is $16.90 per hour for all employers, regardless of size. The increase reflects a 2.49% CPI adjustment over the 2025 rate of $16.50, tied to annual indexing under Labor Code § 1182.12(c). This means employers can no longer treat any prior year’s rate as a safe baseline.
The statewide rate is a baseline: many California cities and counties set local minimum wages above it, and employers must pay whichever rate is highest for the location where work is actually performed. The UC Berkeley Labor Center maintains a routinely updated list of all California city and county minimum wage rates, which is the most reliable reference for multi-location employers.
2. Exempt Employee Salary Threshold
The white-collar overtime exemptions – executive, administrative, and professional – come with a salary floor that resets every January 1 in lockstep with the minimum wage. With the $16.90 minimum wage now in effect, the mandatory minimum exempt salary for 2026 is $70,304 per year ($1,352 per week), up from $68,640 in 2025.
Two things trip employers up here. First, salary alone doesn’t establish exemption. California also requires that the employee spend more than half their working time on qualifying executive, administrative, or professional duties. An employee earning $75,000 who spends the majority of their time on non-exempt tasks is still entitled to overtime. Second, the threshold compounds: the computer professional exemption now requires a minimum of $122,573.13 per year (or $58.85/hour), and licensed physicians and surgeons must be paid at least $107.17 per hour to qualify for their exemption.
If any salaried employee in your organization is currently earning below $70,304, their classification warrants immediate review. Misclassification exposes employers not just to unpaid overtime, but to missed meal and rest break premiums — penalties that compound across an entire workforce and back pay periods. The employment law attorneys at Gallagher Krich can help assess whether your current classifications hold up.
3. Sector-Specific Wage Schedules
California has increasingly moved toward industry-specific wage rules that run independently of the statewide rate. Two sectors carry the most compliance risk in 2026:
Fast Food (AB 1228):
Covered fast food restaurant employees (those working for chains with 60 or more locations nationally) must be paid a minimum of $20.00 per hour. Unlike the statewide rate, this figure isn’t CPI-indexed; future changes are determined by the state’s Fast Food Council, so employers in this space should monitor Council activity rather than assuming the annual January 1 adjustment cycle applies.
Healthcare (SB 525):
California’s healthcare minimum wage law created five separate wage schedules by facility type, each phased toward a $25.00 floor on different timelines. Large health systems with 10,000 or more full-time equivalent employees – including integrated delivery systems, dialysis clinics, and Los Angeles County facilities – reach $25.00 per hour as of June 1, 2026. All other covered healthcare facility employers move to $23.00 per hour on that same date, with the $25.00 floor applying starting June 1, 2028. Rural hospitals and high governmental payor-mix facilities operate under a longer separate schedule.
Healthcare operators should verify their facility’s exact classification under SB 525 and confirm that payroll systems are updated to reflect the June 1 mid-year adjustment. This step is easy to miss when the annual compliance review happens in December or January.
4. Overtime, Meal, and Rest Break Requirements
California’s overtime and break rules are materially stricter than federal law. Employers who manage California workers under FLSA assumptions routinely create liability without realizing it.
Overtime
Governed by Labor Code § 510, non-exempt employees are entitled to:
- 1.5× their regular rate for hours beyond 8 in a single workday or 40 in a workweek
- 2× their regular rate for hours beyond 12 in a single workday
- 1.5× on the seventh consecutive workday (first 8 hours); 2× for hours beyond 8 on that day
Meal Breaks
Employers must provide an unpaid, uninterrupted 30-minute meal period for any shift over 5 hours, and a second meal period for shifts exceeding 10 hours. Waivers are permissible only in narrow circumstances: a shift of 6 hours or less for the first break, and no more than 12 total hours for the second.
Rest Breaks
Non-exempt employees are entitled to one paid, net 10-minute rest period per every 4 hours worked (or major fraction thereof).
Risk Exposure
A missed or non-compliant meal or rest break triggers a premium pay obligation of one additional hour at the employee’s regular rate of compensation — per violation, per day. Across a workforce of 20 or 50 employees over months or years, that math becomes significant quickly, and it’s exactly the kind of pattern a PAGA plaintiff’s attorney is trained to identify.
5. Paid Sick Leave: Updated for 2026
The minimum entitlement remains 5 days or 40 hours of paid sick leave per year, whichever is greater, for any employee who works in California for 30 or more days within a year. This includes part-time and temporary workers.
California’s Healthy Workplaces/Healthy Families Act underwent significant amendments effective January 1, 2026, expanding the qualifying reasons for which employees may use paid sick leave. Among the new protections: employees who are victims of violence – or whose family members are – may now use paid sick leave to attend judicial proceedings related to the crime. This follows prior expansions under AB 2499 and AB 406 that broadened qualifying uses beyond illness and medical care.
On the accrual side, employers can use either an accrual method (one hour per 30 hours worked) or front-load the full 40 hours at the start of each 12-month period. Total accrual may be capped at 80 hours or 10 days. Employees may begin using leave on their 90th day of employment.
The practical compliance issue most employers overlook: the qualifying reasons for use must be reflected in your written policy. A policy that lists only “illness or injury” is now out of date and creates exposure if an employee is denied leave for a covered reason.
6. PAGA: Reforms, Risks, and What Employers Should Actually Do
The Private Attorneys General Act allows employees to sue employers directly, on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated coworkers, for Labor Code violations – with civil penalties that can reach hundreds of thousands of dollars before a single attorney fee is added.
On July 1, 2024, Governor Newsom signed AB 2288 and SB 92, enacting the most significant PAGA reforms since the law was passed in 2004. The changes that matter most for California business owners:
- Standing is now tighter. Plaintiffs must personally experience the Labor Code violations they seek to pursue on a representative basis, which substantially limits “kitchen sink” PAGA complaints asserting violations the plaintiff never encountered.
- Proactive compliance is rewarded. Penalties can be capped at 15% if the employer took reasonable compliance steps before receiving a PAGA notice, and at 30% if corrective action followed the notice. Documented payroll audits, supervisor training, and policy updates are the kinds of steps that qualify.
- Small employers have a cure pathway. Employers with fewer than 100 employees can submit a formal cure proposal to the LWDA within 33 days of a PAGA notice, potentially halting litigation before a lawsuit is filed.
None of this means PAGA risk has diminished. The LWDA received 8,846 PAGA notices in fiscal year 2024–2025, and volume has not meaningfully declined since the 2024 reforms. What has changed is that employers who demonstrate good-faith compliance efforts have meaningful tools to limit exposure. Those who don’t have fewer defenses than they did before.
The most effective posture is a proactive internal audit — reviewing timekeeping, break practices, payroll calculations, and exempt classifications — conducted before any notice arrives, not in response to one.
Protecting Your Business Starts Before a Claim Is Filed
California’s labor law landscape rewards employers who treat compliance as an ongoing operational priority rather than a periodic checklist. The thresholds above will shift again in 2027. Industry-specific rules will continue to expand. And enforcement (through the LWDA, the Labor Commissioner, and private PAGA actions) isn’t slowing down.
Gallagher Krich, APC works with California businesses on employment law compliance, wage-and-hour disputes, and workforce matters before and after claims arise. If your organization is working from outdated policies or facing an employee claim, contact our team to discuss your specific situation.
For more information, please contact Gallagher Krich, APC at (858) 926-5797 or info [at] tomgallagherlaw.com.
Attorney Advertising. Tom Gallagher is the attorney responsible for this advertising. Updated June 2026.
Thomas F. Gallagher, Esq. is a founding partner of Gallagher Krich, APC, a San Diego law firm focused on business law, civil litigation, and contract disputes. With over 30 years of legal experience, Tom provides strategic counsel to business owners, entrepreneurs, and professionals navigating complex legal challenges across California.
His practice includes drafting and negotiating commercial contracts, resolving business disputes, and advising clients on corporate governance, regulatory compliance, and risk management. Read more »






