Why you may want to consider mediation to maximize your claims and minimize your risk.

Tom Gallagher, Esq., Partner

The chances are good that if you purchased residential real estate in the State of California, standard purchase agreement from the California Association of Realtors (CAR), you agreed to mediation1 and arbitration2 as an alternative to having your claims heard in state court in the event of a real estate dispute.

What’s in the mediation clause of a real estate purchase agreement?

Mediation clauses in a CAR purchase agreement require the parties to make a reasonable effort to mediate their real estate purchase or sale dispute and to attend a mediation session before resorting to filing a claim in the superior courts of the State of California.

Real estate purchase agreements usually have a clause entitling the prevailing party to recover their reasonable fees and costs. (Cal. Civ. Code § 1717).

Why seek mediation in the event of a real estate dispute?

Significant procedural problems can arise when a buyer or seller ignores the mediation and arbitration clauses and proceeds directly to the superior court.

For example, a party who does not first exhaust the alternative dispute resolution procedure (mediation) and proceeds directly to superior court could become liable for the expenses associated with the case. The other party may file a motion to compel arbitration, and the court will either stay or dismiss the case without prejudice. When a party who ignored the mediation provision prevails, they still may be barred from recovering their attorney’s fees, even if they are the prevailing party because they did not first resort to mediation as an alternative to court involvement.

In a California real estate transaction, a buyer or seller typically must demand or agree to participate in mediation before filing superior court if they wish to recover their attorney’s fees. “Seeking mediation is a condition precedent to the recovery of attorney fees by the party who initiates the action.” (Johnson v. Siegel (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th 1087, 1101 [101 Cal.Rptr.2d 412].) Attorney’s fees in California civil lawsuits can equal or even exceed the amount in controversy (the dollar value of the dispute).

Therefore, this provides a strong incentive to the parties to use a full or half-day mediation session before filing suit to preserve costs and secure its right to recover its attorney’s fees and costs.

If you have any questions about Real Estate mediation (commercial or residential), please contact our firm at (858) 926-5797. Our experienced San Diego real estate attorneys may be able to help.

1. Mediation is an informal process where the parties negotiate before a neutral third party lawyer or retired judge who facilitates the negotiation process. Mediation is non-binding unless each party signs a written mediation agreement.

2. Arbitration is more like a private trial. A lawyer or retired judge hears the case and is empowered to make a ruling in most cases, which will be binding unless the parties agree to non-binding arbitration, which is less common. If both parties sign off on an arbitration provision, the courts will likely enforce arbitration and dismiss any case filed in state court without prejudice, then order the parties to arbitration.

Client Reviews

Jonas Y., Google

Rated 5 out of 5

If you need a “ Closer”, go see Troy. Troy has been one of the best attorneys I have ever worked with. I don’t typically give reviews but after the last case Troy helped me settle out of court, I won’t hesitate to use Troy again! Thanks for all you do Troy !

Jonas Y

Daniel E., Google

Rated 5 out of 5

I left a voicemail for Tom late Sunday evening and received a phone call first thing the next morning.

Tom was very quick to reply to any questions I had, and if he was caught up in a meeting, he was sure to return my call promptly.

Tom provided sound and logical advice, during a very stressful and uncertain time. At times I asked him to be more aggressive and was often met with the pros and cons of that decision, allowing me to understand the approach and thought process behind his strategy.

Ultimately he provided options for several paths for us to take, worked swiftly, and got us where we needed to be.

He reached out several times to check on my sanity and make sure I was good.

As someone with very high expectations, I would highly recommend his services. He provided expertise that proved to be successful, and also took the time to make sure I was emotionally solid.

Tom assisted with me with a 50% / 50% ownership conflict.

Daniel E

Bob W., Google

Rated 5 out of 5

What was thought to be a simple breach of contract turned into a nightmare. Through their tenacity and their deep knowledge of the law, we were successful. There is no reason to look any further as you will not get any better representation than this firm. I highly recommend them and strongly suggest that if you are considering starting a business or are already managing one, this firm will guide you, avoiding the troubled waters businesses sometimes find themselves in.

Bob W

Meet Our San Diego Attorneys

Contact Gallagher Krich, APC

Fax: 858-435-4369

30+ years of combined experience.